byantcu's picture
From byantcu rss RSS  subscribe Subscribe

Implementing LMS a case study 

 

 
 
Tags:  e-learning  sencondary school  use case  chamilo 
Views:  62
Published:  November 22, 2011
 
0
download

Share plick with friends Share
save to favorite
Report Abuse Report Abuse
 
Related Plicks
No related plicks found
 
More from this user
Royal Cup Coffee Office Coffee Catalog

Royal Cup Coffee Office Coffee Catalog

From: byantcu
Views: 23
Comments: 0

Print Management That Runs Like

Print Management That Runs Like

From: byantcu
Views: 96
Comments: 0

Mongophilly shell-2011-04-26

Mongophilly shell-2011-04-26

From: byantcu
Views: 125
Comments: 0

Facebook’ s EdgeRank: How to Make Sure You’re in the News Feed

Facebook’s EdgeRank: How to Make Sure You’re in the News Feed

From: byantcu
Views: 98
Comments: 0

E Readiness Rankings June 2009 Final Web

E Readiness Rankings June 2009 Final Web

From: byantcu
Views: 78
Comments: 0

 
See all 
 
 
 URL:          AddThis Social Bookmark Button
Embed Thin Player: (fits in most blogs)
Embed Full Player :
 
 

Name

Email (will NOT be shown to other users)

 

 
 
Comments: (watch)
 
 
Notes:
 
Slide 1: Implementing LMS a case study Peter Van den Broeck SO STJ Hamme
Slide 2: Peter Van den Broeck  English / Dutch Teacher  Masters Degree Languages  No IT-qualifications  Platform manager of Kajakaja  Kajakaja.be – Chamilo 1.8.7.1 with campus Plugin
Slide 3: STJ Hamme  Secondary school – years 3 to 6 (vocational 7)  ASO – technical – vocational  364 students  61 teachers  Using LMS since 2006
Slide 4: First steps…  Introduction in April 2006  Stephen Hargreaves – Working with Webquests  Making a choice: Dokeos or Moodle  Why D0ke0s?    Expertise (trainee from HoWest – AUGent) Simple and clear layout (Partly) Belgian based – language support 100%
Slide 5: Jura – Project D0ke0s  Subdomain  40 schoolwebsite students  1 teacher  Positive experience   Student motivation Participation community (wiki-tool pcool)
Slide 6: Level 1 – Sep 2006  Separate domain – hosted environment (kajakaja)  Account for every student / teacher  Choice of use was with teacher (noobligation)  5 teachers in 8 classes  LIMITED SUCCESS
Slide 7: First push – Jan 2007  Introduction teachers    of ‘Mededelingen’ for Weekly update All school related forms for download announcements  Result: +30 passive users (teachers)  PRACTICAL USE
Slide 8: Second push – Mar 2007    Update to 1.8.x Series of hands-on sessions for interested teachers Results:    5 -> 20 teachers who use courses for students 60% of students have a login Math dpt starts its own cross curricular course  DOWNSIDE: Flashy Fileserver
Slide 9: Some setbacks – Sep 2007  AUGent     partnership project Free dokeos platform Centralized management Helpdesk Left the program after 14 days  Failure in update to 1.8.4 -> reinstall from scratch  Relaunch 3rd week of September   Bad practice: teachers hand out account details Problems -> less teachers rely on platform hence less students get their account details
Slide 10: Revenge at hand – Jan 2008  Introduction ‘ leerlingenmededelingen’  All students get login through administation  Initiation by IT-teachers  End Jan 95% have logged in at least once  Stable active teacher usage 40%  BUT: Flashy Fileserver, only 2 teachers use other modules  Motivational setback: no real progress in 1,5 years
Slide 11: Land ahoi – Mar 2008  Campus Plugin – Ludwig Theunis  Amazing Tool  Installation of 2nd testing Platform  Test with selected group  May: decision to implement -> total cleanup  June: mandatory sessions to introduce new platform
Slide 12: Kajakaja 2.0 – Sep 2008  Dokeos     1.8.5 + Campus Plugin  New features: Timetable Journal based on timetable Students listings Reservations tool
Slide 13: A better way?  Personalised mini-manual  Voluntary school journal  Mandatory for reservations  Timetable changes: consult the platform  AMAZING: by half Sep   letters 1st day of school + 96% of students 99% of teachers
Slide 14: STS – Jan 2009  Student Tracking System  Mandatory  Learning disorders – Results – Behaviour  RESULT    More teachers become ‘active users’ Links – documents – announcements Most popular: Journal - Listings
Slide 15: Open evaluation  Positive perception  More up than down  Split in IT and LMS  STS is sole source information  DOWN: first student hack
Slide 16: Year 2 2.0 – Sep 2009  Same procedures  Active Day 3 of school year  Massive course growth (DEPT courses)  DOWN: 1 course -> several courses  CLB Login
Slide 17: Jan – May 2010  New      headmaster: Former Dokeos Platform Admin New blood Go Chamilo decision Limit course creation Cleanup
Slide 18: On hold – Sep 2010  Start 1.4    schoolyear: Dokeos 186 + Campus  Oct   Mandatory school journal Precreated courses DB stability problems in webhosting (21.000 tables) decision migrate to VPS Decision upgrade to Chamilo 2010:
Slide 19:  Move   The move – Dec 2010 Dokeos 186 to VPS Problem: DB of 21.000 tables Rights management (webhosting sucks)  Upgrade   to Chamilo Stable! Database bugs:  Course list  Within courses
Slide 20: Chamilo – Jan 2011  Introduction Jan 3rd  Positive response to overall system  Negative response   Social network (exclusion) Currently unused again
Slide 21: IT admin – Mar 2011  Added   new function Single tracking system for IT errors Positive response
Slide 22: Back to the future  Downside   in usage: Fileserver Administrative platform  Hands  Plans on session for different modules  Online testing experiments  Learning paths
Slide 23: Future for Chamilo  Hopeful developments 2.0  Plugin Code: integrated in full project  More config options for Social network  Mobile version
Slide 24: Question Time

   
Time on Slide Time on Plick
Slides per Visit Slide Views Views by Location