Hide Notes 

Slide 1: Freedom to Operate Search Freedom to operate search - prior launching of the product Description Freedom-to-operate, abbreviated as "FTO", is usually used to mean determining whether a particular action, such as testing or commercialising a product, can be done without infringing valid intellectual property rights of others. A freedom to operate search involves searching the claims language of third-party in-force patents to determine if the claims of the any prior art read on aspects of the technology that is to enter the marketplace. Freedom to Operate research is typically conducted as a due diligence effort to prevent potential infringement. Workflow 1 •Documents recieved from the client •Review of documents and background search on Internet/Scientific literature libraries •Collection of keywords and search query building •Collection of the documents from the search query and taxonomy formation 2 3 •Sample analysis on the taxonomy •Client review and feedback on the taxonomy and search query 4 •Finalizing search query and taxonomy •Starting analysis Useful for  Product launch by identifying infringing patent and potential losses which may happen  Claims modification according to prior arts found  Saving billions of dollars which can lose in potential infringement 5 •Finishing analysis •Marking relevant patent documents 6 •Structuring report •High/Medium/Low ranked patent documents marked Search/Analysis Searching prior art from around the world using reliable patent databases and other databases of client interest. Analysis is based on the claims of the application patent and technology/claimed aspects of the invention. Taxonomy is prepared by patent analysts based on claims of the application patent and then search is carried out to find out relevant patent documents. 7 •Creative graphs/charts/tables preparation •Final delivery of the report Results Reporting will be done on a collaborative platform. The results are summarized in a structured report which includes, usually a tabular presentation of the documents and references to important passages, grouped according to relevance. It is also possible to have copies of the original documents or relevant passages, in the case of very long documents. Individual needs can be taken into account when structuring the report. Format All reports will be stored on our password protected proprietary web2.0 platform; however it is possible to deliver report in other formats according to client requirements. About us: IPCalculus is a global intellectual property and technology research services firm. We provide customized services in the form of competitive patent landscape analysis, technology sector overviews, patent portfolio analysis, patent monitoring & alerts, patent-product mapping, patent licensing support, trend analysis and various patent searches. Our clients consists of fortune 50 and fortune 500 companies. Our analysis techniques and visualization tools helps CEOs, patent attorneys, R&D department, IP department to make effective business decisions. We focus on a niche set of service offerings and have proven experience in working with counsel in technology and related fields. All rights reserved E-mail. info@ipcalculus.com Website. www.ipcalculus.com
Slide 2: Infringement/Invalidation Search Patent claims invalidation, claims modification to save from possible infringement Description Patent Infringement Searches are performed to locate any unexpired patents whose claims read on the patent. The search may also be undertaken by a product owning company to identify patents that it may be infringing upon. Our team of domain-experts does an in-depth search for the patents in various databases. We have various in-house language expertises like Japanese, Chinese, German, French, Russian, etc. A determination of patent infringement involves a twostep process. First, the claims are analyzed by studying all of the relevant patent documents. Second, the claims must "read on" the accused device or process. This merely means that the device or process is examined to see if it is substantially described by the claims; in other words, the claims are tested to see whether they describe the accused infringement. Workflow 1 •Identification of client's purpose and collecting necessory patent documents •Background Study 2 •Claims reading and finding key aspects claimed in the invention •Query building using various keywords obtained from background/key aspects •Patent searching in Micropat/ USPTO/EPO/JPO/KPO etc. 3 4 •Finding patents whose claims infringe upon the patent provided •Categorize patents according to high, medium and low relevancy 5 •Marking patent pdfs with relevant claim portions mapped •Reporting on collaborative plateform where you can match drawings, claims. Useful for  You will save millions of dollars in infringement cases prior to the launch of product.  Estimating the risk of patent infringement before developing, producing, and marketing a product.  Pre-acquisition or investment assessments of a patent’s strength.  Invalidation of the claiming patent can save your patent.  Figure out the competitor’s patent coming in your way and invalidate it. Results Reporting will be done on a collaborative platform. The results are summarized in a structured report which includes, usually a tabular presentation of the documents and references to important passages, grouped according to relevance. It is also possible to have copies of the original documents or relevant passages, in the case of very long documents. Individual needs can be taken into account when structuring the report. Search/Analysis For Invalidating patent claiming your patent/competitor patent coming in your way, we look at the independent claims of the claiming patent and make list of key aspects claimed in the invention. We then search by the keywords and their synonyms in various patent databases around the world to find any relevant patent matching the claims of claiming patent. Format All reports will be stored on our password protected proprietary web2.0 platform; however it is possible to deliver report in other formats according to client requirements. About us: IPCalculus is a global intellectual property and technology research services firm. We provide customized services in the form of competitive patent landscape analysis, technology sector overviews, patent portfolio analysis, patent monitoring & alerts, patent-product mapping, patent licensing support, trend analysis and various patent searches. Our clients consists of fortune 50 and fortune 500 companies. Our analysis techniques and visualization tools helps CEOs, patent attorneys, R&D department, IP department to make effective business decisions. We focus on a niche set of service offerings and have proven experience in working with counsel in technology and related fields. All rights reserved E-mail. info@ipcalculus.com Website. www.ipcalculus.com
Slide 3: Prior-art search/State-of-art search, Novelty/Patentability search Searching for prior-arts available, novelty in inventions and patentability prior to filling Description These searches form an essential part of the process of determining the patentability of a specific invention. Here, identification of prior art forms part of the Patentability (also referred to Novelty) search, which is probably the most frequently exercised patent search. In order for an invention to be viable for securing a patent, no prior record of a similar or identical product or process may exist. This search task aims at clarifying whether any such records exists in patent and non-patent literature that have been published prior to the filing of a patent application in question. Prior art also plays a vital role in Validity (Invalidity) searches that are exercised in order to render specific claims of a patent, or the complete patent itself invalid by identifying matter published before the filing date of the patent in question (Publication date in case of European country patent). It is of note that for this kind of searches the legally active part of the targeted patent, the claims, form the basis of the information need. For Novelty searches we review the document by the client very carefully, make the keywords and search for patents similar to the client’s novelty. Workflow 1 •Documents recieved from the client •Review of documents and background search on Internet/Scientific literature libraries •Collection of keywords and search query building •Collection of the documents from the search query and taxonomy formation •Sample analysis on the taxonomy •Client review and feedback on the taxonomy and search query •Finalizing search query and taxonomy •Starting analysis •Finishing analysis •Marking relevant patent documents •Structuring report •High/Medium/Low ranked patent documents marked •Creative graphs/charts/tables preparation •Final delivery of the report 2 3 4 5 6 Useful for  Identifying whether the invention talked about is satisfying the basic laws of filing an invention; it is “novel”, “non-obvious” as well as “Usefulness”.  This helps in making distinctions between what is already known (prior art) and what is new (the invention).  A prior-art, patentability search can avoid losing the investment in a patent application if the search discovers prior references that would likely preclude patenting the invention.  Inventors can perform basic prior art searchers to see what knowledge (usually in the form of patents) already exist in the invention's scientific area. 7 Results Reporting will be done on a collaborative platform. The results are summarized in a structured report which includes, usually a tabular presentation of the documents and references to important passages, grouped according to relevance. It is also possible to have copies of the original documents or relevant passages, in the case of very long documents. Individual needs can be taken into account when structuring the report. Format All reports will be stored on our password protected proprietary web2.0 platform; however it is possible to deliver report in other formats according to client requirements. Search/Analysis For Prior art searches we review each and every aspect of invention in great detail, get the relevant keywords and search for patent and non-patent literature. About us: IPCalculus is a global intellectual property and technology research services firm. We provide customized services in the form of competitive patent landscape analysis, technology sector overviews, patent portfolio analysis, patent monitoring & alerts, patent-product mapping, patent licensing support, trend analysis and various patent searches. Our clients consists of fortune 50 and fortune 500 companies. Our analysis techniques and visualization tools helps CEOs, patent attorneys, R&D department, IP department to make effective business decisions. We focus on a niche set of service offerings and have proven experience in working with counsel in technology and related fields. All rights reserved E‐mail. info@ipcalculus.com Website. www.ipcalculus.com
Slide 4: Office Action Claims modification according to report sent by patent office Description Upon completing examination of your patent application, a patent examiner is required by the patent statute to prepare a written report of the results of the examinations, including furnishing copies of all prior art references cited in the examination report with the exception of all prior art references furnished to the examiner with your information discloser statement. This examination report is commonly known as Office action report. The office action cites prior art and gives reasons why the patent claims is allowed or can be rejected by the Examiner. An office action may be "final" or "non-final". In a non-final office action, the applicant is entitled to reply and request reconsideration or further examination, with or without making an amendment. These rejections deal with matters of wording and formality, and are usually straight forward to deal with. To reduce these complications our analysts perform a prior art search to look for infringing claims and reply with necessary modifications required. Workflow Our team will look at the patent documents provided by patent office and we suggest modification in the claims accordingly. Results Reporting will be done on a collaborative platform. The results are summarized in a structured report which includes, usually a tabular presentation of the documents and references to important passages, grouped according to relevance. It is also possible to have copies of the original documents or relevant passages, in the case of very long documents. Individual needs can be taken into account when structuring the report. Documents are provided with suggested modification in the claims and necessary explanations. Format All reports will be stored on our password protected proprietary web2.0 platform; however it is possible to deliver report in other formats according to client requirements. Useful for     Clearance from office action from examiner Invention/novelty to be patentable Check for novelty, obviousness and usefulness Modification of claims usually making narrower Search/Analysis We review documents sent by the patent office and their comments over it. Based on it we suggest changing the language of claims or add/delete words which make invention to be patentable. About us: IPCalculus is a global intellectual property and technology research services firm. We provide customized services in the form of competitive patent landscape analysis, technology sector overviews, patent portfolio analysis, patent monitoring & alerts, patent-product mapping, patent licensing support, trend analysis and various patent searches. Our clients consists of fortune 50 and fortune 500 companies. Our analysis techniques and visualization tools helps CEOs, patent attorneys, R&D department, IP department to make effective business decisions. We focus on a niche set of service offerings and have proven experience in working with counsel in technology and related fields. All rights reserved E-mail. info@ipcalculus.com Website. www.ipcalculus.com