abie's picture
From abie rss RSS  subscribe Subscribe

Evolution of Enterprise Software Development 

 

 
 
Tags:  business software  architect 
Views:  295
Published:  April 28, 2010
 
0
download

Share plick with friends Share
save to favorite
Report Abuse Report Abuse
 
Related Plicks
Effective Standards Work William Cox

Effective Standards Work William Cox

From: jocelee7
Views: 109 Comments: 0

 
The Role of Software Architects

The Role of Software Architects

From: marketman
Views: 12 Comments: 0
From A Pm Who Proposed And Negotiated Fees For One Of The 21st Centuries Most Successful Architects Comes A Series Of Powerful Guides That Assist Architects Write And Negotiate Better Agreements. http://lnk.co/IFZ4W
 
UML Conference Presentation

UML Conference Presentation

From: umlconference
Views: 215 Comments: 0
This year’s conference is designed to deliver valuable information you need. Whether you are a system engineer, CIO, CTO, project manager, business analyst, software architect or developer, you will benefit from three content-packed days of interact (more)

 
000-M23 Practice Exam Test Questions

000-M23 Practice Exam Test Questions

From: PracticeQuestions
Views: 143 Comments: 0

Searching for 000-M23 Practice Exam Test Questions. The IBM 000-M23 practice exam test questions are provided by Pass-Guaranteed.com. Visit: www.pass-guaranteed.com to order the full product. Pass-Guaranteed.com offers 000- (more)

 
000-M06 Practice Exam Test Questions

000-M06 Practice Exam Test Questions

From: PracticeQuestions
Views: 143 Comments: 0
Searching for 000-M06 Practice Exam Test Questions. The IBM 000-M06 practice exam test questions are provided by Pass-Guaranteed.com. Visit: www.pass-guaranteed.com to order the full product. Pass-Guaranteed.com offers 000-M06 Practice Exam Test Que (more)

 
New Social Networking Site Now in Business

New Social Networking Site Now in Business

From: barry0912
Views: 49 Comments: 0
New Social Networking Site Now in Business ... for Business


 
Skills.doc

Skills.doc

From: anon-521905
Views: 58 Comments: 0
Skills.doc
 
See all 
 
More from this user
calpine 2001annualreport

calpine 2001annualreport

From: abie
Views: 584
Comments: 0

Foreign Investment in India - An Overview

Foreign Investment in India - An Overview

From: abie
Views: 91
Comments: 0

Why Use a Realtor?

Why Use a Realtor?

From: abie
Views: 115
Comments: 0

Leveraging Google+ for Search, Sales and Success

Leveraging Google+ for Search, Sales and Success

From: abie
Views: 61
Comments: 0

SLM  DebtInvestorPresent ationMay2008

SLM DebtInvestorPresentationMay2008

From: abie
Views: 46
Comments: 0

UNERTAN SYNDROME: A CASE SERIES DEMONSTRATING HUMAN DEVOLUTION

UNERTAN SYNDROME: A CASE SERIES DEMONSTRATING HUMAN DEVOLUTION

From: abie
Views: 353
Comments: 0

See all 
 
 
 URL:          AddThis Social Bookmark Button
Embed Thin Player: (fits in most blogs)
Embed Full Player :
 
 

Name

Email (will NOT be shown to other users)

 

 
 
Comments: (watch)
 
 
Notes:
 
Slide 2: Mitch Denny Principal Consultant http://notgartner.wordpress.com mitch.denny@readify.net
Slide 4: yes, that Readify!
Slide 6: choice. Our systematic understanding of the causes of chapter choice is weak, even though the choice. Our systematic understanding of the causes of chapter choice is weak, even though the opinions expressed by experts from every corner are very strong. As is frequently the case with opinions expressed by experts from every corner are very strong. As is frequently the case with empirical research, we are better at saying what is false than what is true. For example, in a highly empirical research, we are better at saying what is false than what is true. For example, in a highly choice. Our systematic understanding of the causes of chapter choice is weak, even though the quantified analysis of 1,529 consumer cases in Texas, Illinois, and Pennsylvania (all filed in 1981), quantified analysis of 1,529 consumer cases in Texas, Illinois, and Pennsylvania (all filed in 1981), opinions expressed by experts from every corner are very strong. As is frequently the case with Sullivan et al. tested chapter choice against a range of potential causes of the choice is weak, even though the Sullivan et al. tested chapter choice against a range of potential causes of the choice. They concluded empirical research, we are better at saying what is false than what is true. For example, in a highly choice. Our systematic understanding of the causes of chapter choice. They concluded O m w that many of the plausible and intentional determinants of choice (e.g. ability to pay, assets to protect, that many of the plausible and intentional determinants of choice (e.g. ability to pay, assets to protect, quantified analysis of 1,529 consumer cases in Texas, Illinois, and Pennsylvania (all filed in 1981), opinions expressed by experts from every corner are very strong. As is frequently the case with m w unsecured debt levels, state exemption levels) had little if any causal effect. What mattered example, in a highly empirical research, we are better at saying what is false than what is true. For more, but unsecured debt levels, state exemption levels) had little if any causal effect. What mattered more, but Sullivan et al. tested chapter choice against a range of potential causes of the choice is weak, even though the m w w w m choice. Our systematic understanding of the causes of chapter choice. They concluded still not a lot,quantified analysis as a recent move within theTexas, or choice of a specialist attorney. in 1981), were such factors of 1,529 consumer cases in state Illinois, and Pennsylvania (all filed still not a lot, were such factors as a recent move within the state or choice of a specialist attorney. that many of the plausible and intentional determinants of choice (e.g. ability to pay, assets to protect, m opinions expressed by experts from every corner are very strong. As is frequently the case with Sullivan et al. tested chapter choice against a range of potential causes of the choice. They concluded 4 4 unsecured debt levels, state exemption levels) had little if any causal effect. What mattered example, in a highly empirical research, we are better at saying what is false than what is true. For more, but The authors noted the plausible and intentional determinants of choice (e.g. ability to pay, assets to protect, The authors noted that the district of filing is far and away the most powerful predictor of that many of that the district of filing is far and away the most powerful predictor of m m still not a lot,quantified analysis as a recent move within theTexas, or choice of a specialist attorney. in 1981), were such factors of 1,529 consumer cases in state Illinois, and Pennsylvania (all filed chapter choice, which debt true today asexemption levels) had little if example, that during 1998 there more, but chapter choice, which is as true today as it was in 1981. Consider, for example, that during 1998 there m 4 unsecured is as levels, state it was of the causes of chapter choice is weak, even mattered m Sullivan et al. tested chapter choice against a range of potential causes of the choice. They concluded choice. Our systematic understanding in 1981. Consider, for any causal effect. Whatthough the choice. Our systematic understanding of the causes of chapter choice is weak, W though the even m were 22,840 still not a lot, were experts Western District move within the stateis 74% were chapter 13 attorney. non-business filings in the from every corner Tennessee, of which frequently the case with were 22,840 non-business w by experts Western District m are w strong. As is 74% were chapter 13 filings in the from every corner Tennessee, of which frequently the case with The authors noted the plausible and intentional determinants of choice (e.g. ability to pay, assets to protect, of that many of that the district of filing is far and away the most powerful predictor of opinions expressed by such factors as a recent of are very strong. As or choice of a specialist opinions expressed very filings. During that periodare better at25,011 non-businessthan what is true. For example, in a highly 4 filings. During that periodare better at25,011 non-businessthan what is true. For example, in a highly chapter choice, which debt true today asexemption levels) had little if example, that during 1998 there more, but empirical research, we there were saying what is false filings in the Western District of empirical research, we there were saying what is false filings in the Western District of unsecured is as levels, state it was of the causes of chapter choice is weak, even mattered choice. Our systematic understanding in 1981. Consider, for any causal effect. Whatthough the The authors 1,529 that which 17% in Texas,is far 13 and Pennsylvania (all filed in 1981), Washington, of the district of filing Illinois, filings. Washington, of which 17% in Texas, Illinois, filings. w m w were opinions expressed by such factors as a recent of are very strong. As or choice of the case with non-business filings in the from every corner Tennessee, of which frequently a specialist quantified analysis of noted consumer cases were chapter and away the most powerful predictor of quantified analysis of 1,529 consumer cases were chapter 13 and Pennsylvania (all filed in 1981), 22,840 still not a lot, were experts Western District move within the stateis 74% were chapter 13 attorney. 5 5w chapter tested which as true today a it was in 1981. Consider, for example, They concluded w m Sullivan et al. choice,chapterischoice against asrange of potential causes of the choice.that during 1998 there Sullivan et al. tested chapter choice against a range of potential causes of the choice. They concluded filings. During that periodare better at25,011 non-businessthan what is true. For example, in a highly 4 empirical research, we there were saying what is false filings in the Western District of Such and intentional determinants of choice (e.g. Such and intentional determinants of choice the Washington, of the district in filing Illinois, filings. were the plausible differences persist Western District of the ability to pay, 74% to protect, w W D % to The authors 1,529 that which 17% of Texas,is far 13 and Pennsylvania (all filed in 1981), that many of22,840 non-business filings in the over time, revealingTennessee, of whichassetswere chapter 13 that many of the plausible differences persist over time, revealing (e.g. ability tow pay, assetsw protect, quantified analysis of noted consumer cases were chapter and away the most powerful predictor of potent but amorphousDuring of “local legal levels) had littleare no causal effect.or models that will potent but amorphousD state “local legal levels) had littleare no causal effect.or models that will factor 5 filings. factor that period there were 25,011 non-business filings in the Western District of w W D chapter tested which as true today as it was in 1981. Consider, for example, They concluded unsecured debt levels, state exemption culture.” There if any simple ideas What mattered more, but unsecured debt levels, of exemption culture.” There if any simple ideas What mattered more, but Sullivan et al. choice,chapterischoice against a range of potential causes of the choice.that during 1998 there completely account were such factors as a recent of which 17%the state or choice offound them attorney. Washington, move within were chapter 13 filings. completely account were such factors as a recent move within the state or choice offound them attorney. that many of22,840 non-business filings in the over time, revealingTennessee, of whichassetswere chapter 13 W w %w Such and intentional determinants of choice (e.g. were the plausible differences persist Western District of the ability to pay, 74% to protect, still not a lot, for the large variations in chapter choice–or at least no one has a specialist yet. still not a lot, for the large variations in chapter choice–or at least no one has a specialist yet. What follows is a brief description of a5promising lead. What follows is a brief description of a promising lead. potent but amorphousDuring of “local legal levels) had littleare no causal effect.or models that will 4 4 filings. factor that period there were 25,011 non-business filings in the Western District of unsecured debt levels, state exemption culture.” There if any simple ideas What mattered more, but choice. Our systematic understanding ofdifferences is far and away the most powerful predictor of choice. Our systematic understanding of the causes is far and away the most powerful predictor of completely account were such factors as a recent of which 17%the state or choice offound them attorney. Such the causes persist over time, revealing the m The authors noted that the district of filing of chapter choice is weak, even though the The authors noted that the district of filing of chapter choice is weak, even though the Washington, move within were chapter 13 filings. still not a lot, for the large variations in chapter choice–or at least no one has a specialist yet. opinions expressed by experts from every “local legal very Consider, forfrequentlythat case with there will opinions expressed bym is as true today ascorner are very Consider, forfrequentlythat case with there w experts from every it was in 1981. strong. As is example, the duringm m What follows is a brief description of a5promising lead. chapterpotent but amorphous factor of corner are culture.” Thereis example, the duringmodels that choice, which is as true today as it was in 1981. strong. As are no simple ideas or 1998 chapter choice, which 1998 4 empirical research, weaccount for at saying what is false thanof Tennessee,Forunderstanding highly causes of chapter empirical weak, even though the at saying what is false thanof Tennessee,Forwhich 74%in a highly choice. Our systematic understanding ofdifferences is far and away the most powerful predictor of completely are better the large Western District Our is true. of least 74%in has found them in chapter choice–or at example, were the m m Such the causes of chapter choice revealing the were 22,840 non-business filings in the variations choice. whatsystematic whichno one a of chapter 13 yet. were 22,840 non-business filings in the Western District what is true. of example, were chapter 13 The authors noted that the district of filing persist over time, is weak, even though the choice is research, we are better quantified analysis of 1,529 period there were is a brief description of a promising lead. inDistrict of What follows Texas, Illinois, and Pennsylvania (all filed 1981), quantified analysis of case period w m filings. During that consumer cases in 25,011opinions expressed by experts from every corner are very strong. As is frequently the1,529 with W there were 25,011 Illinois, and Pennsylvania (all filed inDistrict of opinions expressed by experts from every “local legal very Consider, forfrequentlythat case with there will non-business filings in the Western filings. During that consumer cases in Texas, non-business filings in the Western 1981), chapterpotent but amorphous factor of corner are culture.” Thereis example, the duringmodels that choice, which is as true today as it was in 1981. strong. As are no simple ideas or 1998 Sullivan et al. tested chapter choice against a range of17% were chapterof the choice is weak, even though the than Sullivan true. For example, in choice against a range of potential chapterof the choice. They concluded empirical research, weaccount for at saying what is false thanof Tennessee,Forwhichno one a highly them yet. choice. Our systematic understanding of empirical research, filings. better at saying what is false the causes of chapter are O m w Washington, of which potential causes 13 wechoice. They concluded Washington, of which 17% were causes 13 filings. completely are better the large Western District what is true. at example, were found were 22,840 non-business filings in the variations in chapter choice–or of least 74%in has chapter 13 what is et al. tested chapter a highly that many of the plausible and intentional determinants quantified(e.g. ability to pay, assets to cases in Texas, Illinois,that many of the plausible and intentional determinants 5 choice (e.g. ability to pay, assets to protect, quantified analysis of 1,529 period there were is a brief description of a promising lead. inDistrict of of of opinions expressed by experts from every corner are very strong. As consumer protect, m w 5 choice analysis of 1,529 is frequently the case with What follows Texas, non-business filings in the Western filings. During that consumer cases in 25,011 Illinois, and Pennsylvania (all filed 1981), and Pennsylvania (all filed in 1981), unsecured debt levels, state exemption levels) had little Sullivan et al.effect.Our systematic understanding highly causes of chapterthelevels, state exemption levels) had little if any time, revealing the mattered more, but Sullivan et al. tested chapter choice against a range of17% were chapterof the choice is weak, even though the unsecured debt choice. They concluded empirical research,Such differences persistif any time, choice. what is mattered example, range of potential causes of choice is weak, even though the we are better at saying what causal than What true. For againstbut a of the m w w m choice. Our systematic understanding of the causes of chapter choice. They concluded over is false tested chapter choice more, a in revealing the Such differences persist w over causal effect. What Washington, of which potential causes 13 filings. still not a lot,quantified analysis as a of “local legal within theThereof the plausible and intentionalthat in every corner are very aability to pay, assetsfactor case withlegal within theThere arechoice of a ideas or models thatthat many of the plausible and intentional determinants 5 corner are very strong.pay, assets to protect, were such factors of recent move culture.” Texas, or no simple ideas by experts determinants of choice not strong. As is frequently the of “local m culture.” state or no simple specialist attorney. will still (e.g. lot, but amorphous toas a recent move of Illinois, and Pennsylvania (all from 1981), opinions expressed by experts from every choice (e.g. ability to As is frequently the case with potent but amorphous factor1,529 consumer cases inmany arechoice expressedor modelsfiled will potent were such factors protect, that state opinions of a specialist attorney. Sullivan et al. for the large variations in chapter choice–or at least state exemption levels) concluded is falsecompletely is true. For example, in 4 unsecured debt levels, state exemption levels) had little if any time, revealing theis mattered example, in a highly empirical research,Such differences persist what causal effect. What true. For more, but we are better at saying over is false than what completely accounttested chapter choice against a range of potential causesonethe choice. them had little if any causal effect. What mattered more, buta highly in chapter choice–or at least no one has found them yet. unsecured debt levels, no of has found They yet. empirical research, we are better at saying what than what account for the large variations 4 The authors noted the plausible and intentional determinants quantified(e.g. ability to pay, assets towithin in Texas, Illinois, and manoted thatattorney. in 1981),brieffar and awayof a promising lead. predictor of that many of that What follows is a brieffar and awayof aofwerepowerful predictor of move cases the state or choice of specialist What follows is a is description the most powerful the district of filing is description athe promisinganalysis of 1,529 consumer protect, choice lead. The authors the district m still not a lot,quantified analysis as a of “local legal within theThere arechoice of a ideas or modelsfiled in 1981), were such factors of recent move culture.” state Illinois, and Pennsylvania (all that potent but amorphous factor1,529 consumer cases in Texas, or no simple specialist attorney. will still not lot,most such factors as a recent Pennsylvania (all filed of filing chapter choice, which debt true today asexemption levels) had little Sullivan et al.effect. Whatthough the unsecured is as levels, state it was of the causes of chapter choice that during 1998 there againstbut chapter choice, which of as true today as it was in 1981. Consider, for example, that during 1998 there m completely accounttested chapter choice against a range of potential causesonethe choice. them concluded Consider, for example, is weak, even mattered more, a range of potential causessystematic understanding of the causes of chapter choice is weak, W though the if any causal tested chapter choice m 4 choice. Our systematic understanding in 1981. 4 choice. Our is the choice. They concluded even m Sullivan et al. for the large variations in chapter choice–or at least no of has found They yet. were 22,840 still not a lot, were experts Western DistrictTheTennessee, of stateisthe districtchapter intentionalaway the most of choice (e.g. ability to pay, the Western District m are w strong. As is 74% were chapter 13 non-business filings in the from every corner are very that many of74% were ofspecialist attorney. of authorsstrong. As frequently a and is were 22,840 non-business filings in assets to every corner the which choice of the case with that many of that What follows is a brieffar and awayof a promising lead. predictor of the district of filing is description the most powerful opinions expressed by such factors as a recent move withinnoted thatorthe plausible filing 13 far and determinants powerful predictorw by experts from protect, of Tennessee, of which frequently the case with The authors noted the plausible and intentional determinants of choice (e.g. ability to pay, assets to protect, opinions expressed very of filings. During that periodare better at25,011 non-businessthan whatsystematic understanding highly1981. Consider, forempirical weak,duringthough the atmore, but is false than what is true. For example, in a highly filings. During effect. we are there chapter choice, which debt true today asexemption levels) had little if example, that during 1998 there more, but 4 unsecured is as levels, state it was of the causes of chapter choice is weak, even mattered empirical research, we there were saying whatchapter choice,in thetrue. For example, in a of the causes of chapterifexample,research, What mattered 25,011 non-business filings in the Western District of is false filings whichWestern District asexemption levels) had little choice is that even 1998better saying what choice. Our systematic understanding in 1981. Consider, for any causal effect. Whatthough the unsecured debt levels, state any causal that period there were choice. Our is is as true today of it was in Washington, of the district of filing 22,840 and Pennsylvaniasuchfiled predictorcorner of very strong. which analysis the specialist were opinions expressed by such factors as a recent of are very strong. As or choice of the case with non-business filings in the from every corner Tennessee, of which frequently a specialist The authors 1,529 that which 17% in Texas,is far 13non-business by expertsfactorsevery District areTennessee, ofAs is or74% were chapter 13 whichcases in Texas, Illinois, filings. w m w quantified analysis of noted consumer cases were chapter and awayathe most powerful Westernrecent move within the state frequentlyof a 1,529 withattorney. were chapter 13 and Pennsylvania (all filed in 1981), 22,840 still not a lot, were experts Western District move within the stateis 74% were chapter 13 attorney. Illinois, filings. lot, filings in from as a quantified choiceWashington, of of case consumer 17% were opinions expressedwere (all the in 1981), of still not chapter tested which as true today a it was in 1981. 4 causes of the choice. They concluded is false than what is et al. Districtchapter a highly 5 Consider, for there better at saying what w 5w m Sullivan et al. choice,chapterischoice against asrange of potential that periodexample, that during 1998 there filings inSullivan true. For example, in choice against a range of potential causes of the choice. They concluded filings. During that periodare better at25,011 non-businessthan what is true. For example, in a highly 4 empirical research, we there were saying what is false filings in the Western District of filings. During research, we arewere 25,011 non-business the Western tested of empirical were the plausible differences persist Western DistrictThe which 17% were chapter 13 filings.in Texas, Illinois,that many of powerful predictor of Such and intentional determinants quantifiedthe ability to pay, the district of filing is time, revealing (e.g. w W D %w Washington, of the district in filing Illinois, filings. that many of22,840 non-business filings in the over Washington,of Tennessee, of whichassetswere chapter 13 far and away the mostthe plausible differences persist over time, revealing (e.g. ability tow of choice authors noted that 74% to cases pay The authors 1,529 that which 17% of Texas,is far 13 and Pennsylvania (all filed in 1981), quantified analysis of noted consumer cases were chapter and away the most powerful predictor of of analysis of 1,529 consumer protect, and Pennsylvania (allSuch and intentional determinants of choice the filed in 1981), potent but amorphousDuring of “local legal levels) had5littleare nochaptereffect.orwhichWestern againstbut it was in 1981. Consider, of the choice.that “local legal culture.” There are no simple ideas or models that will simple filings the choice District of potent causes for example, They concluded there factor of during 1998 w filings. factor that period there were 25,011 if any causal ideas chapteris that will non-business choice,inmodels as true today as W D 5 unsecured debt levels, state exemption culture.” There Sullivan et al. tested What mattered more, a range of potential but amorphousD m W m m chapter tested which as true today as it was in 1981. Consider, for example, They concluded Sullivan et al. choice,chapterischoice against a range of potential causes of the choice.that during 1998 there completely account were such factors as a recent of which 17%the wereof the13non-business filings in the Western District of Tennessee,w to pay, assets to protect, 13 w choice–or at least no one has found them yet. least no one filings. Washington, moveSuch differences or choice of time, them attorney. W were the plausible differences persist Western District of the ability to pay, 74% to protect, Such and intentional determinants of choice (e.g. still not a lot, for the large variations in chapter choice–or at state persist over found revealing the determinantscompletely account for which 74% were chapter m within were chapter plausible and intentional that many of22,840 non-business filings in the over time, revealingTennessee, of whichassetswere chapter 13 of that many 22,840 has a specialist yet. of choice (e.g. ability the large variations in chapter w % w choice. Our systematic understanding of the causes of chapter choice is weak, even though the choice. Our systematic understanding of the causesO chapter choice is weak, even though the of m w What follows is a brief description of aunsecured debt levels, state exemption levels) had non-business filings in themodels that willmore, but What follows potent but amorphousDuring of “local legal levels) had littleare no causal effect.or models that will 5but amorphous that period legal culture.” There are any causal effect. Western District a filings. factor that period there were 25,011 non-business filings in the Western District of 4 unsecured debt levels, state exemption culture.” There if any simple ideas What mattered more, but potent promising lead. factor of “localthere were 25,011 little ifno simple ideas or What mattered is ofbrief description of a promising lead. filings. During opinions expressed by experts from every corner are very strong. As is frequently the case with opinions expressed by experts from every corner are very strong. As is frequently the case with m w Such differences persiststill not lot, werepowerful 17%as a recent move within the state no one has found them yet. over account for such factors were chapter 13 filings. time, revealing large completely account were such factors as a recent of which 17%the state or choice offound them attorney. Washington, move within were chapter 13 filings. The authors noted that the district of filing is far and awayathe mostthe whichvariations in chapter choice–or at leastor choice of a specialist attorney. wm m w still not a lot, for the large variations in chapter choice–or at least no one has a specialist yet. completely Washington, of the predictor of empirical research, we are better at saying what is false than what is true. For example, in a highly empirical research, we are better at saying what is false than what is true. For example,w a highly m w in w m m w What follows is a brief description of a5promising lead. chapterpotent but amorphous factor of “local legal culture.” There are no simple ideas orpromising lead. choice, which is as true today as it was in 1981. 4 Consider, for example, that of a 1998 there wm w mm 4 What follows is a brief descriptionduringmodels that will 5 quantified analysis of 1,529 consumer cases in Texas, Illinois, and Pennsylvania (all filed in 1981), quantified analysis of 1,529 consumer cases in Texas, Illinois, and Pennsylvania (all filed in 1981), m completely account filings large Western DistrictThe authors noted thatpersistwere found revealing the in chapter choice–or at whichno oneover thefiling is of and away the most powerful predictor of m m were 22,840 non-business for thein the variations choice.of Tennessee, of understanding of chapter 13 far chapter choice is weak, even though the w W D w %w Such differences persist over time, revealing the The authors noted that the district of filing is far and away the most powerful predictor of Our Such differences the district time, them yet. systematic least 74% has of causes Sullivan et al. tested chapter choice against a range of potential causes of the choice is weak, even though the Sullivan et al. tested chapter choice against a range of potential causes of the choice is weak, even though the choice. Our systematic understanding of the causes of chapter choice. They concluded choice. Our systematic understanding of the causesO chapter choice. They concluded of m w What follows 25,011opinions expressed by expertsas trueevery corner legal culture.” There frequently theideas or models that will mW filings. During that period there were is a brief description choice,in amorphous factor of “local arein 1981. Consider, are example, that during W non-business of a promisingis from District as it was very strong. As is for no simple case with 1998 there D ww D chapterpotent but amorphous factor of “local legal culture.” There are no simple ideas or models that will choice, which is as true today as it was in 1981. Consider, for example, that during 1998 there potent but the lead. chapter filings whichWestern today of that many of the plausible and intentional determinants of choice (e.g. ability to pay,is frequently the case with that many of the plausible and intentional determinants of choice (e.g. ability to pay, assets m protect, m to opinions expressed by experts from every corner are very strong. As assets to protect, opinions expressed by experts from every corner are very strong. As is frequently the case with m w completely account filings large Western District of Tennessee, at least 74% were found them Washington, of which 17% were chapter 13non-businessfor the in the variationsDistrictwhatchoice–or ofexample,one has found them w W %w were 22,840 non-business for thein the variations in chapter choice–or of whichno one has chapter 13 yet. empirical research, filings. better at saying what is falsein chapter is true. For which 74% were chapter 13 yet. completely account filings large Western than of Tennessee, at least no in a highly were 22,840 we are unsecured debt levels, state exemption levels) hadsaying if any causal effect. What mattered example, in a highly empirical research, we are better at little what is false than what is true. For more, but unsecured debt levels, state exemption levels) had little if any causal effect. m is mattered example,w a highly empirical research, we are better at saying what is false than what true. For more, but m What w in wW m mm What follows 25,011 non-business filings in the Western 5 filings. During that period there were is a brief description of a promising lead. District of quantified analysis of 1,529 a brief description of a promising andfilings in the Western District of What follows is consumer cases in Texas, Illinois, lead. filings. During that period there were 25,011 non-business Pennsylvania (all filed in 1981), still not a lot,quantified analysis as a recent move within theTexas,or choice of a specialist attorney. in 1981), were such factors of 1,529 consumer cases in state Illinois, and Pennsylvania (all filed still not a lot,quantified analysis as a recent move within theTexas, or choice of a specialist attorney. in 1981), were such factors of 1,529 consumer cases in state Illinois, and Pennsylvania (all filed w m mw Such differences persist over Washington, ofchapter17% were chapter 13 filings. causes of chapterthe choice. Theyeven though the time, choice. Our systematic understanding of the revealing the m Washington, of which 17% were chapter 13 filings. Sullivan et al. tested which choice against a range of potential causes of choice is weak, concluded 4 4 Sullivan et al. tested chapter choice against a range of potential causes of the choice. They concluded Sullivan et al. tested chapter choice against a range of potential causes of the choice. They concluded potent but amorphous factor of “local legal culture.” many of the plausible and intentionalthat will m m w 5 that There are no simple ideas or models determinants of choicevery strong. to pay, assets tothe case with opinions expressed by experts from every corner are (e.g. ability As m frequently protect, is 5 The authors noted the plausible and intentional determinants of choice (e.g. ability to pay, assets to protect, The authors noted the plausible and intentional determinants of choice (e.g. ability to pay, assets m protect, w m w that many of that the district of filing is far and away the most powerful predictor of that many of that the district of filing is far and away the most powerful predictor of m to completely account for the large variations in chapter choice–or at least persist over found revealing the what is causal effect. What mattered more, buta highly m m Such differences persist over time, revealing the unsecured debt levels, state exemption levels) had little if any false than what is true. For example, in empirical research, we time, them saying Such differences no one has are better atyet. chapter choice, which is as true today asexemption levels) had little if example, that during 1998 there more, but chapter choice, which debt true today asexemption levels) had little if example, that during 1998 there more, but m wof unsecured debt levels, state it was of the causes of chapter choice is weak, even mattered unsecured is as levels, state it was of the causesO chapter choice is weak, m Whatthough the W m m choice. Our systematic understanding in 1981. Consider, for any causal effect. Whatthough the choice. Our systematic understanding in 1981. Consider, for any causal effect.w m even mattered w What follows is a brief description a lot,promisinganalysis of 1,529 consumer within in Texas, Illinois, simple ideas or models that will m potent but amorphous factor of “local legal culture.” There are no simple ideas or models that will still not of aquantified lead. factoraof “local legal culture.” There arechoice of a specialist attorney. inw were such factors (all potent but amorphous as recent move cases the state or no and Pennsylvania W filed 1981), were 22,840 still not a lot, were experts Western District move within the stateis 74% were chapter 13 attorney. non-business filings in the from every corner Tennessee, of which frequently a specialist were 22,840 still not a lot, were experts Western District move within the stateis 74% were chapter 13 attorney. non-business filings in the fromas a recent of Tennessee,w which frequently a D of Wm specialist w %w opinions expressed by such factors as a recent of are very strong. As or choice of the case with opinions expressed by such factorswevery corner are very strong. As or choice of the case m with w w completely account for the large variations in chapter choice–or at least no one has found them yet. 4 Sullivan et al. for the large variations in chapter choice–or at least no one has found They concluded completely accounttested chapter choice against a range of potential causes of the choice.them yet. filings. During that periodare better at25,011 non-businessthan what is true. For example, in a highly 4 filings. During that periodare better at25,011 non-businessthan what is true.w example,w a highly 4 W Dm empirical research, we there were saying what is false filings in the Western District of empirical research, we there were saying what D false filings in the Western District of m is w For in w What follows is a brief description of a promising lead. The authorsfollows thatbriefdistrict of filingintentionalaway the most of choice (e.g. ability to pay, assets to protect, noted is the plausible and is far and determinants powerful predictor of What that manyaof the description of a promising lead. The authors 1,529 that which 17% in Texas,is far 13 filings. Washington, of the district of filing Illinois, and Pennsylvania (all filed in 1981), The authors 1,529 that which 17% in Texas,is far 13 W Pennsylvania Washington, of the district of filing Illinois, and filings. powerful in 1981), %w w m w quantified analysis of noted consumer cases were chapter and away the most powerful predictor of quantified analysis of noted consumer cases were chapter and away the mostw (all filed predictor of m chapter choice, which is as true today asexemptioncauses of chapterifexample, that duringthough the more, but unsecured debt levels, state it was in levels) had little any causal effect. What mattered choice. Our systematic understanding of the1981. Consider, forchoice is weak, even 1998 there 5 5 chapter tested which choice against as it was in 1981. Consider, for example, They concluded chapter choice, which choice against as it was in 1981. Consider, for example, They concluded w w m Sullivan et al. choice,chapteris as true today a range of potential causes of the choice.that during 1998 there Sullivan et al. tested chapteris as true today a range of potential causes of the choice.that during 1998 there were 22,840 non-business by expertsfactorseveryrecent move within the state frequentlyof a specialist attorney. still not a lot, filings in from as a corner of very strong. which choice the case with opinions expressedwere suchthe Western District areTennessee, ofAs is or74% were chapter 13 Such and intentional determinants of choice (e.g. Such and intentional determinants of choice the were the plausible differences persist Western District of the ability to pay, 74% to protect, were the plausible differences persist Western revealing (e.g. ability to pay, 74% m protect, 13 Wto chapter w %w that many of22,840 non-business filings in the over time, revealingTennessee, of whichassetswere chapter 13 that many of22,840 non-business filings in the over w District of Tennessee, of whichassetswerem D m time, filings. During that periodwe arewere 25,011 non-business filings in what is true. For example, in a highly 4 empirical research, there better at saying what is false than the Western District of potent but amorphousDuring of “local legal levels) had littleare no causal effect.or models that will potent but amorphousDuring of “local legal levels) had littleare no causal effect.or models that will m simple filingsWhat Western District of m wm filings. factor that period there were 25,011 non-business filings in the Western District of filings. factor that period there were 25,011 non-businessideas m themattered more, but in w W D unsecured debt levels, state exemption culture.” There if any simple ideas What mattered more, but unsecured debt levels, state exemption culture.” There if any D Wm m Washington, of which 17% were chapter 13 filings.in Texas, Illinois, and the most powerful predictor of The analysis of 1,529 consumer cases quantifiedauthors noted that the district of filing is far and away Pennsylvania (all filed in 1981), completely account were such factors as a recent of which 17%the state or choice offound them attorney. Washington, move within were chapter 13 filings. completely account were such factors as a recent of which 17%the state or choice offound them w w % w Washington, move within were chapter 13 W m at filings. m still not a lot, for the large variations in chapter choice–or at least no one has a specialist yet. still not a lot, for the large variations in chapter choice–orw least no one has a specialist attorney. m yet. 5 chapter choice, which choice against as it was in 1981. Consider, for example, They concluded Sullivan et al. tested chapteris as true today a range of potential causes of the choice.that during 1998 there What follows is a brief description of a5 promising lead. What follows is a brief description of a5 promising lead.w W m 4 4 Such differences of the plausible and intentional determinants of choice (e.g. ability to pay, assets to protect, 13 were 22,840 non-business filings the that many persist over time, revealing in the Western District of Tennessee, of which 74% were chapter choice. Our systematic understanding ofdifferences is far and away the most powerful predictor of choice. Our systematic understanding ofdifferencesO far andm choice ismost powerful predictor of w persist over the weak, even The authors noted that theSuch the causes of chapter choice is weak, even though the district of filing persist over time, revealing the The authors noted that theSuch the causes is chapter time, revealing the though the district of filing of away wm m w potent but amorphous factorstate exemption levels) had non-business filings in themodels that willmore, but filings. During that period legal culture.” There are any causal effect. Western District unsecured debt levels, of “localthere were 25,011 little ifno simple ideas or What mattered of opinions expressed by experts from every “local legal very Consider, forfrequentlythat case with there will opinions expressed by experts from every “local legal very Consider, forfrequentlythat case with there will m wm or w chapterpotent but amorphous factor of corner are culture.” Thereis example, the duringmodels that choice, which is as true today as it was in 1981. strong. As are no simple ideas or 1998 chapterpotent but amorphous factor of corner are culture.” Thereis example, the duringmodels that choice, which is as true today as it was in 1981. strong. As are no simple ideas w 1998 wm mm completely Washington, of whichvariations in chapter choice–or at leastor choice of a specialist attorney. account for the large 17% were chapter 13 filings. still not a lot, were such factors as a recent move within the state no one has found them yet. empirical research, weaccount for at saying what is false thanof Tennessee,Forwhichno one a highly them yet. empirical research, weaccount for at saying whatw false thanof Tennessee,Forwhichno one a highly them yet. m is w completely are better the large Western District what is true. at example, were found completely are better the large Western District what is true. at example,w were found m m were 22,840 non-business filings in the variations in chapter choice–or of least 74%in has chapter 13 were 22,840 non-business filings in the variations in chapter choice–or of least 74%in has chapter 13w W D w m %w What 4 follows is a brief description of a promising lead. 5 quantified analysis of 1,529 period there were is a brief description of a promising lead. inDistrict of What follows Texas, non-business filings in the Western quantified analysis of 1,529 period there were is a brief description of a promising lead.w District of What follows Texas, non-business filings in W Western m mW filings. During that consumer cases in 25,011 Illinois, and Pennsylvania (all filed 1981), filings. During that consumer cases in 25,011 Illinois, and Pennsylvania (all filed in 1981), D the w D Such differences the district of filing is far and away the most powerful predictor of The authors noted thatpersist over time, revealing the Sullivan et al. tested chapter choice against a range of17% were chapterof the choice is weak, even though the choice. Our systematic understanding of the causes of chapter choice. They concluded Sullivan et al. tested chapter choice against a range of potential chapterof the choice is weak, even though the choice. Our systematic understanding of the causesO chapter choice. They w of m concluded w w Washington, of which potential causes 13 filings. Washington, of which 17% were causes 13 W filings. % potent but amorphous factor of as it was in culture.” There for no simple ideas or models there chapter choice, which is as true today “local legal 1981. Consider, are example, that during 1998 that will that many of the plausible and intentional determinants 5 corner are very strong.pay,is frequently the case with of that many of the plausible and intentional determinants 5 corner are very strong.pay, assets m protect, m of to opinions expressed by experts from every choice (e.g. ability to As assets to protect, opinions expressed by experts from every choice (e.g. ability to As is frequently the case with m w completely account filings large Western in chapter choice–or at least no one has chapter 13 were 22,840 non-businessfor the in the variationsDistrict of Tennessee, of which 74% were found them yet. unsecured debt levels, state exemption levels) hadsaying if any time, revealing theis mattered example, in a highly unsecured debt levels, state exemption levels) had little if any time, revealingw is mattered example,w a highly What m mm empirical research,Such differences persist what causal effect. What true. For more, but we are better at little over is false than what empirical research,Such differences persist what causal effect. mthe true. For more, but we are better at saying over is false than what m in wW m What follows is a brief description of a non-business filings in the Western District of filings. During that period there were 25,011 promising lead. still not a lot,quantified analysis as a of “local legal within theThere arechoice of a ideas or modelsfiled in 1981), were such factors of recent move culture.” state Illinois, and Pennsylvania (all that still not a lot,quantified analysis as a of “local legal within theThere arechoice of a ideas or modelsfiled in 1981), were such factors of recent move culture.” state Illinois, and Pennsylvania (all that wm m mw potent but amorphous factor1,529 consumer cases in Texas,or no simple specialist attorney. will potent but amorphous factor1,529 consumer cases in Texas, or no simple specialist attorney. will m m w Washington, of which 17% were chapter 13 filings. Sullivan et al. for the large variations in chapter choice–or at least no of has found They yet. 4 Sullivan et al. for the large variations in chapter choice–or at least no of has found They yet. 4m completely accounttested chapter choice against a range of potential causesonethe choice. them concluded completely accounttested chapter choice against a range of potential causesonethe choice. them concluded m 5 The authors noted the plausible and intentional determinants of choice (e.g. ability to pay, assets to protect, that many of that What follows is a brieffar and awayof a promising lead. predictor of the district of filing is description the most powerful The authors noted the plausible and intentional determinants of choice (e.g. ability to pay, assets m protect, m w that many of that What follows is a brieffar and awayof a promising lead.w the district of filing is description the most powerful predictor of m to w m W Such differences persist over time, revealing the chapter choice, which is as true today asexemption levels) had little if example, that during 1998 there more, but chapter choice, which debt true today asexemption levels) had little if example, that during 1998 there more, but m wof unsecured debt levels, state it was of the causes of chapter choice is weak, even mattered unsecured is as levels, state it was of the causesO chapter choice is weak, m Whatthough the W m m choice. Our systematic understanding in 1981. Consider, for any causal effect. Whatthough the choice. Our systematic understanding in 1981. Consider, for any causal effect.w m even mattered w potent but amorphous factor of “local legal culture.” There are no simple ideas or models that will were 22,840 still not a lot, were experts Western District move within the stateis 74% were chapter 13 attorney. non-business filings in the from every corner Tennessee, of which frequently a specialist were 22,840 still not a lot, were experts Western District move within the stateis 74% were chapter 13 attorney. non-business filings in the fromas a recent of Tennessee,w which frequently a D of Wm w %w specialist opinions expressed by such factors as a recent of are very strong. As or choice of the case with opinions expressed by such factorswevery corner are very strong. As or choice of the case m with w w completely account for the large variations in chapter choice–or at least no one has found them yet. filings. During that periodare better at25,011 non-businessthan what is true. For example, in a highly filings. During that periodare better at25,011 non-businessthan what is true.w example,w a highly W Dm 4 4 empirical research, we there were saying what is false filings in the Western District of empirical research, we there were saying what D false filings in the Western District of m is w For in w What follows is a brief description of a promising lead. The authors 1,529 that which 17% in Texas,is far 13 filings. Washington, of the district of filing Illinois, and Pennsylvania (all filed in 1981), The authors 1,529 that which 17% in Texas,is far 13 W Pennsylvania Washington, of the district of filing Illinois, and filings. powerful in 1981), %w w m w quantified analysis of noted consumer cases were chapter and away the most powerful predictor of quantified analysis of noted consumer cases were chapter and away the mostw (all filed predictor of m chapter tested which choice against as it was in 1981. Consider, for example, They concluded 5 chapter choice, which choice against as it was in 1981. Consider, for example, They concluded 5 w w m Sullivan et al. choice,chapteris as true today a range of potential causes of the choice.that during 1998 there Sullivan et al. tested chapteris as true today a range of potential causes of the choice.that during 1998 there were the plausible differences persist Western District of the ability to pay, 74% to protect, Such and intentional determinants of choice (e.g. were the plausible differences persist Western revealing (e.g. ability to pay, 74% m protect, 13 Such and intentional determinants of choice the Wto chapter w %w that many of22,840 non-business filings in the over time, revealingTennessee, of whichassetswere chapter 13 that many of22,840 non-business filings in the over w District of Tennessee, of whichassetswerem D m time, potent but amorphousDuring of “local legal levels) had littleare no causal effect.or models that will potent but amorphousDuring of “local legal levels) had littleare no causal effect.or models that will m simple filingsWhat Western District of m wm filings. factor that period there were 25,011 non-business filings in the Western District of filings. factor that period there were 25,011 non-businessideas m themattered more, but in w W D unsecured debt levels, state exemption culture.” There if any simple ideas What mattered more, but unsecured debt levels, state exemption culture.” There if any D Wm m completely account were such factors as a recent of which 17%the state or choice offound them attorney. completely account were such factors as a recent of which 17%the state or choice offound them w w % w m at m Washington, move within were chapter 13 filings. Washington, move within were chapter 13 W filings. still not a lot, for the large variations in chapter choice–or at least no one has a specialist yet. still not a lot, for the large variations in chapter choice–orw least no one has a specialist attorney. m yet. What follows is a brief description of a5 promising lead. What follows is a brief description of a5 promising lead.w W m 4 4 The authors noted that theSuch differences is far and away the most powerful predictor of district of filing persist over time, revealing the The authors noted that theSuch differences is far and away the most powerful predictor of district of filing persist over time, revealing the wm m w or m w chapterpotent but amorphous factor of “local legal culture.” There are no simple ideas or models that will choice, which is as true today as it was in 1981. Consider, for example, that during 1998 there chapterpotent but amorphous factor of “local legal culture.” There are no simple ideas w models that will choice, which is as true today as it was in 1981. Consider, for example, that during 1998 there wm mm completely account filings large Western District of Tennessee, at least 74% were found them completely account filings large Western District of Tennessee, at least 74% were found them m m were 22,840 non-business for thein the variations in chapter choice–or of whichno one has chapter 13 yet. were 22,840 non-business for thein the variations in chapter choice–or of whichno one has chapter 13 yet. w W D w %w What follows 25,011 non-business filings in the Western What follows 25,011 non-business filings in W Western mW filings. During that period there were is a brief description of a promising lead. District of filings. During that period there were is a brief description of a promising lead.w District of D the w D Washington, of which 17% were chapter 13 filings. Washington, of which 17% were chapter 13 W filings. w %w 5 5 Such differences persist over time, revealing the Such differences persist over time, revealing the m potent but amorphous factor of “local legal culture.” There are no simple ideas or models that will potent but amorphous factor of “local legal culture.” There are no simple ideas or models that will m m m w completely account for the large variations in chapter choice–or at least no one has found them yet. completely account for the large variations in chapter choice–or at least no one has found them yet. m m What follows is a brief description of a promising lead. What follows is a brief description of a promising lead.w W m disclaimer
Slide 8: sorry.
Slide 10: why?
Slide 12: change
Slide 13: change > opportunity
Slide 14: change > opportunity > profit!
Slide 16: forces
Slide 17: forces consequences
Slide 18: forces consequences strategies
Slide 23: Aa architect classification scheme
Slide 24: fundamental, but subtle changes over time forces
Slide 25: mobility (and by extension, connectivity)
Slide 26: mobility (and by extension, connectivity)
Slide 27: €€‚ƒ work life balance
Slide 28: €€‚ƒ work life balance
Slide 29: €€‚ƒ work life blending
Slide 30: question: is Facebook a personal or work tool?
Slide 31: ‚ƒ
Slide 32: ‚ƒ
Slide 33: new users = new expectations ‚ƒ
Slide 34: video: little britain
Slide 35: if the computer says no, I’ll find another computer that says yes. ‚ƒ
Slide 36: other forces
Slide 37: computing power (empowered users) ‚ƒ
Slide 41: the thing about forces . . .
Slide 42: consequences knock on effects from forces
Slide 44: computer scientist
Slide 45: computer scientist
Slide 46: computer scientist computer user
Slide 47: computer scientist computer user
Slide 48: vendor computer scientist computer user
Slide 49: vendor computer scientist computer user
Slide 50: vendor software developer system administrator computer user
Slide 51: vendor software developer system administrator computer user
Slide 52: what next?
Slide 53: tip: who works for who?
Slide 54: computer scientist
Slide 55: computer scientist computer user
Slide 56: vendor computer scientist computer user
Slide 57: vendor software developer system administrator computer user
Slide 58: vendor software developer system administrator computer user
Slide 59: question: what about my special requirements?
Slide 60: vendor software developer system administrator computer user
Slide 61: video: yahoo pipes
Slide 62: see also: Microsoft Popfly Google App Engine? Apple Automator
Slide 63: implications
Slide 64: firewall
Slide 65: firewall value on the inside value on the outside
Slide 66: firewall value on the inside value on the outside Exchange, CRM, SharePoint . . . Yahoo! Pipes, Facebook, SalesForce . . .
Slide 67: firewall value on the inside value on the outside Exchange, CRM, SharePoint . . . Yahoo! Pipes, Facebook, SalesForce . . .
Slide 68: firewall value on the inside value on the outside Exchange, CRM, SharePoint . . . Yahoo! Pipes, Facebook, SalesForce . . .
Slide 69: firewall value on the inside value on the outside
Slide 70: firewall value on the inside value on the outside
Slide 71: firewall value on the inside value on the outside
Slide 72: firewall value on the inside value on the outside
Slide 73: firewall value on the inside value on the outside
Slide 75: consider: Microsoft Online (Exchange/CRM)* Windows Live Mesh Oracle on EC2 Saasu* GoGrid SaaSGrid
Slide 76: question: what does my techology stack look like?
Slide 78: (provides network, power, cooling, redundancy) major data centers
Slide 79: (provide operting systems, virtualisation) platform vendors (provides network, power, cooling, redundancy) major data centers
Slide 80: (provide identity, database, general APIs) framework vendors platform vendors (provide operting systems, virtualisation) (provides network, power, cooling, redundancy) major data centers
Slide 81: (provide user functionality) applications (provide identity, database, general APIs) framework vendors platform vendors (provide operting systems, virtualisation) (provides network, power, cooling, redundancy) major data centers
Slide 82: (provide user functionality) applications (provide identity, database, general APIs) framework vendors platform vendors (provide operting systems, virtualisation) (provides network, power, cooling, redundancy) major data centers
Slide 83: (provide user functionality and mashups) tier #2 applications tier #1 applications (provide user functionality) (provide identity, database, general APIs) framework vendors platform vendors (provide operting systems, virtualisation) (provides network, power, cooling, redundancy) major data centers
Slide 85: conscious decisions made to cope with or take advantage of change strategies
Slide 86: get out before you’re homeless . . .
Slide 91: Windows Live ID & CardSpace, Yahoo!, Google, Open ID + millions more?
Slide 92: question: what about Active Directory?
Slide 93: tip: let users control identity
Slide 94: Identity Table: UserID IdentityTypeID IdentityReference User Table: UserID ... UserRight Table: UserID RightID UserRightReference
Slide 95: Identity Table: UserID IdentityTypeID IdentityReference
Slide 96: tip: grant and revoke is key
Slide 98: tip: expect a platform
Slide 99: demo: EC2 provisioning
Slide 100: question: great, but what about my users?
Slide 101: business model?
Slide 106: discussion points
Slide 107: limit your liability
Slide 108: rich vs. reach
Slide 109: the role of developers?
Slide 110: the role of sysadmins?
Slide 111: do I run a data center?
Slide 112: CIO vs. CTO
Slide 113: Thank-you! Mitch Denny Principal Consultant, Readify http://notgartner.wordpress.com mitch.denny@readify.net

   
Time on Slide Time on Plick
Slides per Visit Slide Views Views by Location