fish's picture
From fish rss RSS  subscribe Subscribe

Model Fusion=AOP=Feature Interaction 



originally, mapping various DB schemas into some ‘fusion’, so as to integrate respective DBs
with modern genetics DBs, with badly defined schemas and humongous amounts of data, emphasis on logical (as opposed to real) integration

 

 
 
Tags:  Database  integration  fusion 
Views:  1665
Downloads:  4
Published:  September 13, 2007
 
0
download

Share plick with friends Share
save to favorite
Report Abuse Report Abuse
 
Related Plicks
Five Questions to Ask Yourself Before Moving to Oracle Fusion

Five Questions to Ask Yourself Before Moving to Oracle Fusion

From: estuate
Views: 58 Comments: 0
When Oracle bought PeopleSoft—which had already purchased J.D. Edwards—in 2005, thousands of customers wondered what was coming next. Must we migrate? If so, where to? Would it make the most sense to wait for general availability of Oracle E-Busines (more)

 
Corporate PPT Template

Corporate PPT Template

From: ajshafer
Views: 53 Comments: 0

 
Fusion Applications 101

Fusion Applications 101

From: rhaptech
Views: 394 Comments: 1

 
Oracle Staffing Practice

Oracle Staffing Practice

From: cemky
Views: 31 Comments: 0

 
DatabaseAdministrat or-Web Developer.doc

DatabaseAdministrator-Web Developer.doc

From: chefid
Views: 53 Comments: 0
DatabaseAdministrator-Web Developer.doc
 
MySQL Migration

MySQL Migration

From: estuate
Views: 10 Comments: 0
The world-class functionality in Oracle enables our clients to migrate their applications written using other databases, such as MySQL, Microsoft SQL Server and Sybase in a matter of weeks. Migrating databases and their accompanying applications is (more)

 
See all 
 
More from this user
10 Questions  for Google App from Microsoft

10 Questions for Google App from Microsoft

From: fish
Views: 1271
Comments: 1

Top Nielsen/NetRatings Web site lists

Top Nielsen/NetRatings Web site lists

From: fish
Views: 2079
Comments: 0

Knowledge NHSl PART1 Final Jan 2005

Knowledge NHSl PART1 Final Jan 2005

From: fish
Views: 2058
Comments: 0

Helping Students Generate Creative Ideas

Helping Students Generate Creative Ideas

From: fish
Views: 3251
Comments: 0

Nielsen//NetRatings Top 10 Web Sites

Nielsen//NetRatings Top 10 Web Sites

From: fish
Views: 2889
Comments: 0

KM Martyn Laycock Knowledge Management I 2001

KM Martyn Laycock Knowledge Management I 2001

From: fish
Views: 1952
Comments: 0

See all 
 
 
 URL:          AddThis Social Bookmark Button
Embed Thin Player: (fits in most blogs)
Embed Full Player :
 
 

Name

Email (will NOT be shown to other users)

 

 
 
Comments: (watch)
 
 
Notes:
 
Slide 1: Model Fusion ≡ AOP ≡ Feature Interaction Tom Maibaum McMaster University tom@maibaum.org
Slide 2: Some History  Views idea (models in different formalisms used jointly to design systems) originated with:    Atendolfo Angel Pereda Borquez and Roberto Lins de Carvalho, PUC/Rio, 1978-82  mapping models from one formalism to another  used 4 different formalisms Celso Niskier, Daniel Schwabe and Carlos José Pereira Lucena, PUC/Rio, 1984-86  built tool PRISMA to represent in Prolog cluses the information from 3 models, to maintain joint consistency Celso came to Imperial College to do a PhD, introduced the ideas to Anthony Finkelstein and PRESTO  Bashar Nuseibeh, Steve Easterbrook, etc September 13, 2007 CASCON:Model Fusion 2
Slide 3: Related Ideas  Database integration and fusion: originally, mapping various DB schemas into some ‘fusion’, so as to integrate respective DBs  with modern genetics DBs, with badly defined schemas and humongous amounts of data, emphasis on logical (as opposed to real) integration  the idea is to provide a mechanism for joint use of DBs for computational purposes, without actually building a joint model  September 13, 2007 CASCON:Model Fusion 3
Slide 4: Relating Models  Underlying any notion of views/model fusion is a map from one formalism to another how to map a model in one into a model in the other  integrate a view into a global model  relate one view to another   This is straightforward enough, BUT What happens when structure is taken into account? September 13, 2007 CASCON:Model Fusion 4
Slide 5: Relating Models Different formalisms with different concepts of object (component) and morphism (structuring mechanism) September 13, 2007 CASCON:Model Fusion 5
Slide 6: Relating Models … if formalisms closely related; structural elements are inductively mapped to compound structures in other formalism September 13, 2007 CASCON:Model Fusion 6
Slide 7: Relating Models … if formalisms not closely related; structural elements are smeared* across the whole structure in other formalism * see any decent category theory book for a definition September 13, 2007 CASCON:Model Fusion 7
Slide 8: model fusion results in smears on smears* * see any decent category theory book for a definition of smear composition September 13, 2007 CASCON:Model Fusion 8
Slide 9: Summary  This puts us in mind of aspect oriented programming  … which puts us in mind of what was the feature interaction problem of telephony fused structures lose structure  a lot of detail related to simply representing structure indirectly  feature interaction occurs  order of fusion becomes important   WHAT A MESS!!!!!!!!!!  If you don’t want to blow a fuse, don’t literally fuse! September 13, 2007 CASCON:Model Fusion 9

   
Time on Slide Time on Plick
Slides per Visit Slide Views Views by Location